Monday, September 12, 2016

NEW BLOG FOR CED 695

This is space for Graduate students at Central Michigan University for Fall 2016. Zoe Lincoln and Donna Husted Kriss

Initial Research will be discussing articles surrounding the viability of On line courses, Student Motivation, Retention, Learning Disability Accessibility, and Learning styles. We will use this area as a place to post articles, ideas, and other related Proposal ideas.

Image result for CED 695

1 comment:

  1. http://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4749&context=etd 184 page article on Spring 2013
    Supporting students' motivation in college online
    courses
    Jae-eun Lee Russell
    University of Iowa
    Copyright 2013 Jae-eun Russell
    This dissertation is available at Iowa Research Online: http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/2620
    An Abstract
    Of a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of
    Philosophy degree in Psychological and Quantitative Foundations (Educational
    Psychology) in the Graduate College of The University of Iowa
    May 2013
    Thesis Supervisor: Associate Professor Kathy L. Schuh

    ABSTRACT
    Students’ motivation has been identified as a critical factor for meaningful
    engagement and positive academic achievement in various educational settings. In
    particular, self-regulation strategies have been identified as important skills in online
    learning environments. However, applying self-regulation strategies, such as goal setting,
    strategic planning, and reflect performance takes significant effort. Without motivation,
    students will not enact these types of strategies. Autonomous self-regulation has been
    investigated in traditional classroom settings and there is ample empirical evidence of a
    significant relationship between autonomous self-regulation and engagement and
    academic achievement. However, such research was limited in online learning
    environments.
    The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors that affected students’
    autonomous or self-determined forms of regulation as defined in self-determination
    theory (SDT). The study examined the relations between students’ self-regulated
    motivation and four other variables (students’ interests in the course, students’ perception
    of their instructor’s interaction type, students’ technology self-efficacy, and students’
    perception of the degree to which their online learning environment used constructivistbased
    pedagogy), and the interactions among these variables in college online courses. In
    addition, the study examined the relationship between students’ autonomous forms of
    regulation and their engagement, learning achievement, interaction behaviors, and
    satisfaction in the online course. For students’ interaction behaviors, the total number of
    2
    authored and read messages, the total number of visits to the content page, the total
    number of visited topics in the content page, and total duration spent in the content page
    were examined.
    One hundred forty students in 19 online courses participated in this study. The
    results of hierarchical linear modeling analyses revealed: (a) Both environmental factors,
    instructors’ autonomy-supportive interaction and learning environments using
    constructivist-based pedagogy predicted students’ autonomous self-regulated motivation
    (b) Students’ autonomous self-regulated motivation predicted students’ self-reported
    engagement, achievement, and satisfaction (c) Two personal factors, interest in the course
    and technology self-efficacy did not predict students’ autonomous self-regulation (d)
    Students’ autonomous self-regulated motivation did not predict any interaction behaviors.
    The findings from this study are largely congruent with prior theory and research
    in the fields of academic motivation, self-determination, and online learning, which note
    that environmental factors, instructors’ autonomy-supportive interaction and
    constructivist-based pedagogy significantly affect students’ autonomous self-regulation
    in online learning environments.

    ReplyDelete